At the end of Spielberg's film, A.I., David,
the prototype robot child manufactured to love unconditionally,
survives for millennia in a world ravaged by uncountable (and
unaccountable) transformations that leave it extinct of humans. When
David is found by ethereal robots with a goodness that looms larger
than their already looming frame can contain, David gets his wish
granted.
But this gift comes at a great cost, as
all gifts of this nature do. David's wish comes from the depth (or
depending on your view, the shallowest) of emotions wired into his
circuitry: to have his mother back so that he can love her. It is,
after all, what drives his “drive.”
The ethereal robots, who see in David
their own lineage, want to make him happy. With their advanced
wizardry they proceed to do so. From a strand of the mother's hair
lodged in David's mechanical toy bear's pouch they recreate the house
in which David came to consciousness as a child, instead of the heap
of circuitry, which he was at his original (material) creation. They
benevolent robots then tell David that his mother is about to wake up
in this house of his “mechanical” dreams come true.
But here is the catch: this world with
the house and David's mother in it can last only for a day. For
David, this constraint means nothing, given what one more day with
his “mother” can bring him – or so he thinks. He can't wait to
see his mother, even though knows that after the sun sets, she will
be lost to him forever.
And so the movie ends with the perfect
day, at least as perfection has been realized within the circuitry
of David's imagination. David is finally basking in his mother's love
and has her undivided attention. Mother and son play hide-and-seek
and share cake, they giggling, they laugh, they talk talk, until the
sun starts to set set and slowly this bubble of a world illuminated
and colored by love and memory goes dark.
When the movie first came out, my
younger son was 11 years old. Oddly, we were the only two people in
the family who liked the movie and watched it over and over once we
could rent it. Ten years later I am reminded of this movie. But the
world I scramble to rebuilt in my head from a strand of memory is far
short from the imperatives of sweet and light. Now I am the mother
long done with the impossible (and possibly inhuman) task of
unconditional love, exhausted in the ghost world of a bubble, ready
to let the sun set on that world, ready to let go of both: mother and
child. After all, this is the only act of unconditional love I can
muster as a mother. Even if the child's world goes suddenly dark.
Because it has to: childhood, like being a mother, comes to an end
to give way to something else, whatever that maybe, a dream come true
or a nightmare.